Line 3 & 4: block system with manual control and automatic emergency stop (since it was built in 1930s-1950s). Moscow metro has different signaling and controlling systems on different lines. Moscow has classical automated block with stop arms on two lines, rest of the system has cab signalling with speed control and no wayside signals (except for home signals). Moscow has advanced speed control on some lines, which allows it to run 39 tph. He has had his alias for at least as long as I've had mine. If you agree, sign our petition to Governor Cuomo and be counted.Ĭapt Subway is a Queens resident and transit advocate with 37 years of experience working for the New York City Transit Authority, including Senior Schedule Manager. Local stations on the Queens Boulevard line see seven more trains an hour. Greenpoint and Williamsburg can be reconnected to Astoria and Jackson Heights with revived G train service. Neighborhoods like Woodhaven, Rego Park and Ozone Park get quicker service to Midtown. These are the transit advantages of reactivating the Rockaway Branch as a subway line. This would be a significant improvement in service, especially if the "G" were equipped with full length trains. In this way peak trains per hour on the Queens Boulevard local tracks could be raised from the present day 20 trains per hour up to 27 ½ trains per hour, given the current timetables on those three lines. now the "G", along with the "M" and "R" could run along the Queens Boulevard local tracks, with one of these service branching off after 63rd Drive and heading off to a new terminal at either Howard Beach or, it would be hoped, JFK, and thus not threatening to overwhelm 71-Continental as a terminal. By connecting this line to the Queens Boulevard line east (subway north) of 63rd Drive station – the tunnel bell mouths are there specifically for that scenario – the path to another local service terminal would be created, i.e. This is where the old LIRR Rock Line comes into play. The express by-pass alone would have insured this. Even in the original MTA plans from the late ‘60s "G" service would have remained intact. But this passenger friendly part-time service died to make weekend service changes more doable). (For the first few years the “G” line ran to and from Forest Hills nights and weekends, when there was no "V" train service. For this reason the 63rd St connection to Queens Boulevard required a "robbing from Peter to pay Paul" switcheroo: the "G" line had to be cut back to Court Square and its slots on Queens Boulevard given over to another, Manhattan oriented service, first to the "V", and now to the "M". This is necessitated by the terminal at 71-Continental, which can only turn around about 20 trains per hour at the limit, and that not very well. Unfortunately the local tracks, while also theoretically capable of 30 trains per hour, are presently only running at about 20 trains per hour in the peak period. The express tracks are, happily, operating at the current design capacity of 30 trains per hour. the ability of the terminal stations, 71-Continental Avenue-Forest Hills, 179th Street and Parsons/Archer to process or relay arriving and departing trains. The capacity of the Queens Boulevard line is determined by a combination of signaling along each of its four tracks and by its terminal capacity, i.e. This would be better than a greenway, but not as good as a connection to the Queens Boulevard subway line. Many people have argued that the line should be reactivated as a branch of the Long Island Rail Road.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |